India saw a dramatic fall in cases after the ICMR and AIIMS added Ivermectin to their protocols on April 20, 2021. Daily COVID-19 cases, which peaked at 414,188, are now down to 84,332, representing a drop of 80% overall in the country of India.
What seemed to be an impending humanitarian crisis at the end of April has now been brought under control, not with mass vaccination, but instead with an inexpensive repurposed drug, Ivermectin.
Those Indian states that adopted more aggressive Ivermectin policies saw their cases fall far more than 80%, states like Uttar Pradesh - down 98% [37,944 to 596], like Uttarakhand - down 97% [9642 to 287] and Goa - down 90% [4195 to 423]. Delhi saw a 99% drop [28,395 to 238].
Tamil Nadu, which publicly banned Ivermectin, saw their cases rise to the highest in India, and they continued setting state records until May 21, 2021, when they peaked at 36,184.
Meanwhile, deaths have also dropped markedly in Delhi, among the first areas to adopt Ivermectin. Their deaths have plummeted from 448 on May 3 to 36 on June 9, a drop of 92%.
By contrast, Tamil Nadu's deaths rose ten-fold from April 20 to May 27. On June 9, Tamil Nadu's COVID-19 deaths remained the second highest in India at 405, while the states that chose Ivermectin were all dramatically better.
On June 9, Tamil Nadu, with a population less than 4.9% of India's, accounted for almost 20% of all of India's 2,177 June 9 death toll. By contrast, Uttar Pradesh which is on Ivermectin, with 204 million people, three times that of Tamil Nadu, saw a mere 91 deaths, less than 1/4 of Tamil Nadu.
The bottom line is that Ivermectin works, and it works extraordinarily well. You do not need to be a scientist to understand these numbers, as they are self-evident.
Why then does ABC News and Good Morning America need to have a segment entitled "COVID-19 treatment myth about Ivermectin" where they report - falsely - that Ivermectin should not be used and is "dangerous and not advised" to treat COVID-19?
As a board-certified physician with 39 years of practice, I can tell you this is categorically untrue. Even the WHO has reported Ivermectin to be a safe drug used in billions of doses for over four decades, and no statement like the above could be further from the truth.
This begs the question, Why? What could be the possible reason the primetime major US networks must at this moment break their silence on Ivermectin only to broadcast a bald-faced lie? Why is Good Morning America speaking out on June 11, 2021, about Ivermectin and India of all possible topics? Why do India and Ivermectin suddenly matter to Big Media?
Allow me to shed some light on this question by bringing you back to India for a moment. While GMA was trashing Ivermectin on network primetime US television, India was building it up on an Indian primetime television broadcast to - you guessed it - the people of Tamil Nadu.
On their morning program, "Vanakkam Tamil Nadu," which translates to Good Morning Tamil Nadu, reporter Ravishankar posed a similar question to Dr. Pierre Kory about why the Tamil Nadu health authorities do not support Ivermectin. She said that Tamil Nadu doctors might be watching as Kory delivered his answer.
Dr. Kory paused as he sat in disbelief, "That is a stunning opinion you just shared. Absolutely stunning." See the 6:04 mark on the video:
Dr. Kory went on to explain how that opinion was right up there with "the moon landings were faked" or "the earth is flat." He politely suggested they were "isolated" in that opinion because the vast scientific literature on Ivermectin and COVID-19 show it to have unparalleled safety and to be associated with massive and reproducible reductions in mortality.
Five meta-analyses have been completed on Ivermectin. All show a dramatic positive effect. He explained that meta-analysis, the highest form of evidence in medicine, is a pooling of studies that combine all the evidence to generate a unified signal. That signal can only be interpreted in one direction, that Ivermectin must be adopted immediately. Dr. Kory explained how the Tamil Nadu casualties were unnecessary deaths - where the citizens could have been saved with Ivermectin.
The reporter even agreed. "You're right, you're right," she admitted.
But then Dr. Kory bluntly stated the obvious. The true reason is money. If the regulators acknowledged that Ivermectin is effective, then the Emergency Use Authorizations for the vaccines would be revoked. "Many of the vaccines would lose their Emergency Use Authorization if you have an effective treatment. That is a market in the hundred(s) of Billion. And that’s just the vaccines... And the market for Remdesivir…They would all dry up...Ivermectin CANNOT be adopted for that reason."
The WHO is supported to the tune of nearly four billion dollars by the Gates Foundation. Bill Gates is a vaccine proponent. Dr. Tess Lawrie of the British Ivermectin Research and Development Panel (BIRD) recently spoke with Dr. Kory in an interview. They discussed how the sponsor influenced the conclusions - non-scientifically - in key papers on Ivermectin. They further reviewed how numerous studies were eliminated from review and how weak and flawed studies were elevated and overweighted. This was all done with the purpose of twisting the WHO guidelines against Ivermectin to suit their sponsor's interests.
Dr. Kory discussed the concept of Regulatory Capture, a term that applies when a regulatory agency is controlled by the same corporation they are supposed to regulate. In the vaccine situation, it is far worse than the fox guarding the henhouse. It is closer to the fox convincing the farmer to serve him the chicken fried up on a platter.
Big Tobacco cozied up to the FTC, and instead of regulating the industry, the FTC and Congress took money to look the other way and let them off by placing a weak warning label on the pack. The original warning label was supposed to read,
Caution: Cigarette Smoking is Dangerous to Health. It May Cause Death from Cancer and Other Diseases.
However, when greased with enough cash, the warning changed to,
Caution: Cigarette smoking may be hazardous to your health.
The words cancer, cause, and death were expunged. And as everyone knows, this warning label did not save anyone, with the sole exception of the cigarette industry.
Today is no different. When Johnson and Johnson's vaccine reflected a danger signal of blood clots, their vaccinations were temporarily halted. But like with cigarettes, the CDC and FDA had our backs, and before resuming these mass vaccinations, they dutifully added a warning label. I am confident that everyone reads it carefully before they get their shot.
Dr. Peter McCullough, one of the world's most published cardiologists, called out the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccine. In particular, he warned about the Spike Protein that is produced after a person gets the shot. He spoke in a lengthy interview about the vaccine,
"This is far and away the most lethal, toxic, biologic agent ever injected into a human body in American History, and it is going strong, with no mention of safety by our public officials, with wild enthusiasm by our hospitals and hospital administrators, with doctors supporting it.” See the 1:37:08 mark in this video where he reports this:
Regulatory Capture has been a fact of life for Big Polluters and the EPA and Big Pharma and the FDA. Now it has morphed into grotesque proportions with Big Vaccines and the WHO.
When the WHO looks the other way to suggestions that Communist China intentionally leaked the coronavirus to the world, and when Dr. Fauci's emails suggest he knew last year the virus was likely engineered through testing his own agency funded, and when the evidence points to collusion in suppressing the antidotes for the virus, i.e., repurposed drugs like Ivermectin and HCQ, then what does this say about the urgency of the threat we are now experiencing?
The textbook solutions to the thorny problem of Regulatory Capture have always involved legal remedies. Because when you hold corporations responsible with monetary fines, it sometimes helps. However, the monstrous tobacco settlement produced questionable benefits; cigarettes continue to be sold, and people are still dying from them in droves.
Criminal penalties are the harshest solution, and when you make examples of corporate officers, when heads roll, when people do time, real results follow. Dr. Soumya Swaminathan was served legal papers by the Indian Bar Association for the Tamil Nadu disaster. However, there are ever louder rumblings on this side of the pond that certain US public health authorities will be next.
If the GMA broadcast is any indicator, the time to demand reform is now; the time to halt the vaccine roll-out is at hand. The time to bring an end to the “Plandemic” is at once, for “We are the Prey,” and each of us is merely another dollar sign to Big Media, Big Pharma, and Big Regulators. The gatekeepers have sold us out.