COVID surviver ivermectin

Judith Smentkiewicz Wins Court Order for Life Saving Ivermectin

The National Institutes of Health revised its guidance on Ivermectin, January 14, and removed the recommendation against its use for COVID-19. Based in part upon review of data presented by Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter in the December 8 Senate hearings on Early Outpatient Treatment for COVID-19 and Dr. Kory’s testimony delivered directly to the NIH panel on COVID-19 January 6, 2021, the NIH acted.

In my opinion, they did not act enough. Although the NIH no longer recommends against using Ivermectin for COVID-19, they do not recommend for its use. More mothers and grandmothers are dying because the NIH has not taken the added step of including Ivermectin in its Emergency Use Authorization. 

Accordingly, I am today updating the Kory Count, the number of "needless deaths" to use Dr. Kory's words that could have been prevented had the NIH, with the stroke of a pen, accorded Ivermectin EUA status.

The story below shows how 80-year-old grandmother Judith Smentkiewicz had her life saved by Ivermectin, no thanks to her hospital and no thanks to the NIH. Her life was saved in spite of the hospital and the hospital attorney's fight against her use of Ivermectin. They lost in court, and she won in life. 

Judith was given Ivermectin while on mechanical ventilation in the ICU. She responded to the Ivermectin rapidly, going off the ventilator and leaving the ICU within 48 hours. Her recovery was in line with the scientific data – in particular, it was typical of the ICON Study results published in the journal CHEST by Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter in Broward County, Florida. His sickest ICU cases responded best to Ivermectin with less than ½ the death rate of those without the Ivermectin.  

Ivermectin prevents COVID-19 deaths.

The Kory Count shows that up to 140,139 preventable deaths have occurred in the United States since November 19, 2020, when Dr. Peter McCullough first advocated in the Senate for Early Outpatient Treatment, including the use of Ivermectin.

The following story from The Buffalo News, written by Dan Herbeck and published January 14th, 2021, is reprinted below:

A judge ordered Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital last week to give a Covid-19 patient an experimental treatment, and her family and attorneys say they believe that saved 80-year-old Judith Smentkiewicz's life.

The drug Ivermectin – a pill sometimes used to treat children with head lice or to rid dogs and cats of worms – is not yet approved by the federal government for use against Covid-19. But Smentkiewicz's son and daughter call it “a miracle drug” in their court papers. So do her attorneys, Ralph C. Lorigo and Jon F. Minear.

“This lady was on a ventilator, literally on her deathbed, before she was given this drug,” Lorigo told The Buffalo News about Smentkiewicz, a Cheektowaga resident. “As far as we’re concerned, the judge’s order saved this woman’s life.”

Lorigo said one doctor at the hospital allowed the patient to be given the drug, but after she had been given one dose, another doctor at the hospital refused to allow further doses. He said family members went to court to force the hospital to resume treatment with Ivermectin. State Supreme Court Judge Henry J. Nowak sided with the family. 

Dr. Thomas A. Russo, one of the region’s leading experts on infectious diseases, said he was glad to hear that Smentkiewicz is doing better, but he said people should never jump to conclusions about Ivermectin or any other drug based on one patient’s outcome. “There are some indications that this drug may have some merit in treating Covid-19 ... Yes, it is possible that it helped this woman,” Russo said. “But the trials and testing are ongoing. We don’t have definitive data yet to show it does help. Presently, it is not recommended as a treatment for Covid-19.”

Russo is the chief of infectious diseases at the University at Buffalo's Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. He has no involvement in the Smentkiewicz case. The patient’s son, Michael Smentkiewicz, said hospital officials had told him and his sister, Michelle Kulbacki, on Dec. 31 that their mother’s chance of survival – as an 80-year-old Covid-19 patient on a ventilator – was about 20%. He said doctors at the hospital also told the family that Smentkiewicz would probably be on a ventilator in the Intensive Care Unit for at least a month.

“We did a lot of our own research, we read about Ivermectin ... The results sounded very promising, and we decided we had to try something different,” Michael Smentkiewicz said. “We pressured the doctor in the ICU to give it to her. He finally agreed.”

On Jan. 2, Smentkiewicz was given her first dose of Ivermectin, and according to court papers filed by her family, she made “a complete turnaround.”

“In less than 48 hours, my mother was taken off the ventilator, transferred out of the Intensive Care Unit, sitting up on her own and communicating,” Kulbacki said in a court affidavit. But after her mother was transferred to another hospital wing away from the ICU, doctors in that unit refused to give her any more doses of the drug, and her condition quickly declined, the family said in court papers.

“We were astounded when they refused to give her any more doses,” Michael Smentkiewicz said. “That’s why I called Ralph Lorigo and we took the hospital to court.”

Kaleida Health, which operates the hospital, opposed the family’s request in court. Lorigo said Kaleida attorney Michael J. Roach argued to Judge Nowak that doctors – and not the courts – should be making decisions about medical care.

On Jan. 8, Nowak ordered the hospital to “immediately administer the drug Ivermectin” to Smentkiewicz, court papers show.

“But the judge also told us verbally that Judith’s family doctor would have to write a prescription for Ivermectin, which he did,” Lorigo said. “In 46 years as an attorney, I’ve never seen another case where a family had to get a court order to continue a treatment that had already been started by a hospital.”

Michael P. Hughes, spokesman and chief of staff for Kaleida Health, said the health care company is "aware of this family’s position," but he declined to discuss details because of federal privacy laws and because the case has become "a legal matter." Roach, the hospital attorney, declined to comment, telling a reporter to call Hughes. Michael Smentkiewicz said Thursday that his mother’s condition has improved again since the Ivermectin treatments resumed.

“She called me (Wednesday) night. Her voice was raspy, but it was so exciting to hear her voice,” he said. “She is sitting up in bed. She’s off the ventilator, but she has a canula in her nose, providing supplemental oxygen.”

He added that a doctor from the hospital told him Thursday that his mother appears to have "turned the corner" in her fight against the virus.

Michael Smentkiewicz said he also believes the power of prayer helped his mother. “We have not been able to see her since she was taken to the hospital by ambulance on December 29, and that has been hard on all of us,” he said. “Family flew in from all over the country to be here. On New Year’s Eve, about eight of us held a little prayer service for her, out in the hospital parking lot. Even though we couldn’t be with her, we felt that it was important to be on that property, praying for her.”

Ivermectin has some passionate supporters in the medical field, but the U.S. Food & Drug Administration says the drug has not yet been approved for use in this country as a Covid-19 treatment.

“While there are approved uses for Ivermectin in people and animals, it is not approved for the prevention or treatment of Covid-19,” the federal agency says on its website. “You should not take any medicine to treat or prevent Covid-19 unless it has been prescribed to you by your health care provider and acquired from a legitimate source … Additional testing is needed to determine whether Ivermectin might be appropriate to prevent or treat coronavirus or Covid-19.” Some doctors feel the government should move much more quickly to approve Ivermectin as a treatment for the virus that has killed nearly 400,000 Americans.

Dr. Pierre Kory, who heads an association of critical care doctors (and Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter, who published the ICON study of Ivermectin use in Florida) testified before Congress in December, asking federal agencies to prevent "needless deaths" by speeding up its testing and research on Ivermectin.

Smentkiewicz's family describes her as an "amazing woman," a retired secretary who raised two children as a single mother. They said she still works five days a week, cleaning houses. Russo, who urges caution until the government gets more data about Ivermectin, said he “absolutely” understands why Smentkiewicz’s family was so insistent that Kaleida doctors give her the drug.

“I think we all can understand where this family was coming from,” Russo said. “From their point of view, desperate times call for desperate measures.”

The Kory Count of Preventable Deaths is Updated:

Beginning number from November 19 through January 7:  113,105 

Current Kory Count of Preventable COVID-19 Deaths:  140,139

From Surviving Cancer, COVID-19, and Disease: The Repurposed Drug Revolution


Justus R. Hope M.D.

(2) comments


It's late February and I just read this, although I was already familiar with the story. Since this story was published, the video of Dr Kory's passionate testimony on Dec 8 in the Senate hearing, along with another video of Dr Kory talking about the efficacy of Ivermectin, was censored from Youtube, removed from YouTube due to their "policy against misinformation" being posted. Scary. Dangerous. But if you want to see anything positive about the mRNA gene therapy injections being passed off as vaccines, it is everywhere. In February, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Google have teamed up with the White House to censor any and all posts that question or dare challenge the official narrative in regards to COVID-19 virus and especially regarding the so-called "vaccines", which will not prevent you from getting the infection or transmitting it to others, will not prevent sickness and death and will maybe, just maybe lessen the severity of the symptoms if you catch the virus. Those who have received the shots will still need to wear masks and practice social distancing. These are experimental, virtually untested, potentially lethal and/or health and life altering mRNA injections never before tried on humans. The shots have caused a wide range of side effects, from mild to severe to death. This information is being suppressed and for lack of a better word, covered up. Long term side effects are unknown but there are hundreds of respected physicians and scientists trying to warn people about very realistic dangers from these mRNA irreversible injections. People are clearly being steered toward taking these shots which will not do anything to bring our lives back to normal. Nothing will change. The pharma companies who created these concoctions have blanket immunity from any and all liability so they can't be held accountable if people are injured or killed by these shots. However, they will enjoy profits in the hundreds of billions of dollars even if the shots don't work or worse, ruin millions of lives. The pharma companies aren't the only ones in line to receive these profits: Bill Gates, Dr Fauci, the CDC, WHO, FDA and media outlets among many others who push the safety and efficacy of these dangerous shots all have huge conflicts of interest. Dr. Kory and his associates, on the other hand, have nothing to gain by spreading the word on Ivermectin. They won't gain fortunes but they will save hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives. The vaccine pushers will lose billions but people will live. They don't want that to happen so they keep doing everything possible to suppress the studies about Ivermectin. They do everything possible to demean Dr Kory and others like him. If this doesn't give you cause for concern, nothing else will.

Thanks for the great article.


Now Dr Tess Lawrie from the UK has done a meta-analysis of all the studies on Ivermectin which shows that it works as a prophylactic as well as treatment in definitely initial and intermediate stage and potentially later stages due to its anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties. She has written to British Prime minister as well as health ministers and received no replies. She is a respected researcher who has been used by the British government but in this case, they are not interested in learning that anything works as a treatment otherwise vaccines will not role out. After all, the vaccines are being allowed to be used under Emergency Use Application, which is allowed for vaccines that have not been tested over the years as is normal, because they claim there is no treatment for Covid. Now she has proven that is not true.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.