By Guy Taylor and Rowan Scarborough-The Washington Times
WASHINGTON D.C. – The Obama administrationâ€™s ballyhooed military â€œpivotâ€ to Asia is running into some frank talk from the top U.S. commander in the Pacific.
Three years after the Pentagon said it was de-emphasizing Europe in favor of the Asia-Pacific region, Navy Adm. Samuel J. Locklear III said this week that U.S. dominance has weakened in the shadow of a more aggressive China.
â€œOur historic dominance that most of us in this room have enjoyed is diminishing, no question,â€ Adm. Locklear, chief of U.S. Pacific Command, said Wednesday at a naval conference in Virginia.
Although Adm. Locklear said it is obvious that Chinese military power is growing, he suggested that it is unclear whether China will seek to be a hard adversary to the U.S. in the long term, so Washington should be working overtime on steering Beijing toward a cooperative security posture.
â€œChina is going to rise, we all know that,â€ Adm. Locklear said, as reported by Defense News, which included several quotes from his speech at the annual Surface Navy Association meeting.
â€œ[But] how are they behaving? That is really the question,â€ the admiral said, adding that the Pacific Commandâ€™s goal is for China â€œto be a net provider of security, not a net user of security.â€
His remarks offered insight into the introspection at the Pentagonâ€™s highest levels about how the U.S. should tailor its military presence in the region, where Beijing and Moscow â€” regional powerhouses and former Cold War adversaries to Washington â€” are keen to challenge U.S. dominance.
â€œThe problem with this formulation is, for whom does Adm. Locklear think China will be providing security?â€ said Dean Cheng, an analyst at the Heritage Foundation. â€œThe implicit answer is â€˜to everyone,â€™ because the assumption is that we can somehow mold China into being ourselves â€” that China will see its interests as somehow congruent and coincident with those of the United States, and therefore China will assume the mantle of regional provider of public goods.
â€œBut this is a remarkable assumption, especially in light of recent Chinese behavior. China is not interested in providing security for everyone and, frankly, not even for anyone other than itself. This is the kind of bizarre lens that led one of Adm. Locklearâ€™s predecessors to offer to help China with its carrier development.â€
Global Times, Chinaâ€™s official English-language newspaper, trumpeted Adm. Locklearâ€™s remarks in a story beneath the headline â€œU.S. losing grip on Pacific: PACOM.â€
In the Global Times story, Jin Canrong, a deputy dean of the School of International Studies at Renmin University of China, said the American admiralâ€™s comments recognize China as a rising military power.
â€œHowever, some people, who sit in their offices in Washington, tend to hold a more hard-line position toward China,â€ Mr. Jin said.
China has focused its attention and actions almost exclusively on its naval and air power over waterways in its immediate vicinity.
Much of Beijingâ€™s posturing has been within the context of territorial disputes with longtime U.S. ally Japan and smaller Pacific nations over patches of islands in the South and East China seas.
Beijing made global headlines in November by announcing the creation of an air defense zone in the East China Sea that requires foreign civilian and military aircraft to notify Chinese authorities of their flight plans and cargo. It triggered a weeks – long Cold War-style standoff with Washington, and prompted the Pentagon to fly two B-52 bombers through the zone.
The zoneâ€™s establishment was an unprecedented move by Beijing, whose leaders have been more prone to make a show of their expanding military might.
For example, Chinaâ€™s Defense Ministry confirmed this week that the nationâ€™s weapons designers recently conducted the first test of an ultra-high-speed missile vehicle, a cutting-edge technology that presumably could challenge U.S. operations in the Pacific.
The Washington Free Beacon reported Wednesday that the ministry had faxed a two-sentence statement to news agencies and state-run media in Beijing to confirm the flight test of a hypersonic glide vehicle, dubbed the WU-14 by the Pentagon.
Such developments add heat to the debate among foreign policy and national security insiders in Washington over the extent to which the U.S. is on course to respond effectively to China, or is at risk of seeing its influence rolled back in the Pacific.
â€œWe need to think about all scenarios, not just the ones weâ€™ve been dealing with over the last several years where weâ€™ve enjoyed basic air superiority and basic sea superiority,â€ Adm. Locklear said Wednesday. â€œThere are places in the world where in this century we wonâ€™t have them.â€
Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagelâ€™s press secretary, said Thursday that the secretary is committed to a â€œposition of strengthâ€ in the Pacific.