Judge Upholds Landmark 2003 Colorado River Accord

5

iid canal and power

SACRAMENTO – Sacramento Superior Court Judge Lloyd G. Connelly on Tuesday validated the 2003 Colorado River Quantification Settlement Agreement and rejected all of the remaining legal challenges to the landmark accord made by the IID, the Imperial County, and various local environmental and private enterprises hoping to either stop the QSA or alter the terms. The ruling secures a key component of water supply for the San Diego County Water Authority, which will receive 180,000 acre-feet of water this year as result of the QSA and related projects.

Water Authority General Manager Maureen Stapleton, who led negotiations for the Water Authority on its water transfer with the Imperial Irrigation District and the agreement to line the All American and Coachella Canals, was obviously happy with the ruling and called Tuesday’s ruling a “landmark victory in San Diego’s historic quest for a more reliable water supply.”

“The Colorado River QSA and our water transfer agreements were the product of eight years of difficult and contentious negotiations,” Stapleton said. “We were convinced that the historic accords we crafted were done right, met every legal requirement and were built to last the 45-, 75- and 100-year terms of the agreements.

“After 10 years of protracted litigation, today’s ruling underscores and validates the durability of these historic accords.”

The QSA was finalized in October 2003, providing California the means to implement water transfers and supply programs that allow the state to live within its basic annual apportionment from the Colorado River. It was signed by representatives from the Water Authority, Imperial Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Coachella Valley Water District and state and federal governments.

In 2013, supplies from the QSA will meet about 30 percent of San Diego County’s water demand. By 2021, the Water Authority will receive approximately 280,000 acre-feet of water annually from the agreements, which will meet about one-third of the region’s water demands. An acre-foot is approximately 325,900 gallons, or roughly enough to supply two typical single-family households of four for a year.

In December 2011, California’s Third District Court of Appeal reversed a lower court ruling that had invalidated the Water Authority-IID water transfer and a number of other pieces of the QSA. The appeals court remanded several issues to the trial court, including questions about whether the agreement was properly processed under California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA.

In Tuesday’s ruling, Connelly affirmed all of the contested actions, including the adequacy of the environmental documents prepared by the Imperial Irrigation District to enter into the suite of agreements that comprise the QSA.

IID General Manager Kevin Kelley said, “There was nothing in this decision from the Superior Court that changed the conditions at the Salton Sea. There is nothing that could come from any court in the future that would alter the untenable situation at the sea, which is why the IID Board has committed itself to a path that brings together all of the parties to resolve these long standing disputes and finally address the environmental dilemma posed by the Salton Sea.”

For background about the QSA and to read Tuesday’s ruling, go to www.sdcwa.org/quantification-settlement-agreement

5 COMMENTS

  1. Once again IID has won ANOTHER lawsuit against the very people who have bought and paid for the current board of directors….even after the fired the lawyers responsible for the mulitude of court room victories….

    Remember people, the current group of bought and paid for directors were elected with over half a million dollars contributed by people who have stated loudly and publicly that “if you are not a farmer, your opinion should not matter at IID”….

    • Still better than a crop of directors bought and paid for by coastal interests who’s only desire was to siphon all of our water and leave us a desert wasteland while lining their own pockets.

      • In other palabras….it’s Coastal deep pockets agianst Big Farm…..pay attention voters.

      • And that’s worse than farmers who want to buy water for $24 an acre foot and then sell it themselves for $500? We’ve seen the previews for that movie before….The Adventures of the Bass Brothers in 3D, luckily never got off the ground, but damned if they don’t have some followers who are trying to get it released again…

      • We need to get this cleaned up once and for all and let the Feds apportion the water to each farmer, conduct a raid and take the reins for a few years. They’re in the mood and the neighborhood up at the Central Water District in the San Bernadino area. What is going on up there pales by comparison to this insanity. All it takes is a letter insider- Dear President Obama, our poorest of the poor,”largely hispanic”, (this is an effective touch)communities is being victimized by corruption in a power struggle for “OUR” regions water and control area financial benefits between powerful 10% minority ratepayer AG interests and coastal urban interests. Please save us- we are poor and have 29% unemployment while hundreds of millions of dollars are being lost, stolen and wasted at our expense. signed- the victimized 90% silent majority ratepayers

        Do it insider- I know you have it in you. Go get em loco.

Comments are closed.