Becerra testifies at hearing that first amendment rights only apply to individuals

1

uring questioning at a legislative hearing at the state capitol earlier this week, California’s Attorney General nominee shockingly claimed First Amendment religious liberty protections only apply to individuals, not organizations. Nominee Congressman Xavier Becerra made the statement in response to questions from Assemblyman James Gallagher, who asked Becerra what he thought about a law (SB 1146) proposed last year which would have forced religious universities to change their housing policies and moral behavior codes to avoid punishment.

“On religious protections, the protection for religion is for the individual,” Becerrea told Gallagher and a panel of legislators on Tuesday. “I think it is important to distinguish between protections that you are affording to the individual to exercise his or her religion freely, versus protections you are giving to some institution or entity who is essentially bootstrapping the first amendment protections on behalf of somebody else.”
Gallagher took great exception to Becerra’s statement saying it reflected a “fundamental misunderstanding of the freedom of religion and freedom of association.” Gallagher expressed his objections yesterday morning on the floor of the State Assembly when he explained why he opposed Becerra’s nomination as California’s next Attorney General.

“The freedom of religion and the First Amendment applies just as much to the mosque as it does to the Muslim; it applies just as much to the gurdwara as it does to the Sikh; it applies just as much to the church as it does to the Christian,” Gallagher said. “It applies just as much to religious non-profits, universities, and places of education. Their religious rights need to be protected just as much.”
Legal expert Gregory Baylor, an attorney with Alliance for Defending Freedom, not only agrees with Gallagher’s assessment, but he said the Supreme Court agrees with Gallagher as well.

“The contention that only individuals—not organizations—enjoy religious freedom protections is simply false,” Baylor said. “The text of the First Amendment protects the free exercise of religion, and it does not limit that protection to individuals. Common sense tell us that houses of worship, religious universities, faith-based charities, and other corporate bodies can ‘exercise religion.’”
Baylor went on to explain that from the very first church-state cases in the nineteenth century through cases decided just last year, the Supreme Court has consistently acknowledged that organizations can exercise religion, and enjoy the legal protections of religious liberty as well. “Extending fundamental rights to organizations is not unusual,” he said.

To prove his point, Baylor pointed to recent Supreme Court cases affirming that organizations like the New York Times and the NAACP are protected by the free speech, free press, and freedom of association clauses of the Constitution. “It is surprising that a nominee for state Attorney General apparently does not understand these foundational principles,” Baylor said.

William Jessup University President Dr. John Jackson is a strong advocate for the religious liberty rights of California’s religious universities. Over the summer he was one of several individuals that testified at a legislative hearing in opposition to SB 1146, a proposed law which violated the First Amendment rights of universities. Jackson also reacted to Becerras’s religious liberty statements:

“Religious freedom and freedom of association are time honored constitutional protections in American life. Thankfully, the 10th Amendment (reserving authority to the states not expressly given to the newly created federal government) expressly affirms the first amendment right of religious, speech, press and assembly. We will continue to pray for our California government leaders to honor the Constitution.”
Becerra was nominated to the Attorney General position by Governor Jerry Brown to replace Kamala Harris after she was elected to the U.S. Senate last November. The Assembly voted to approve Becerra’s nomination yesterday over the objections of Gallagher and other Republicans. Becerra’s nomination now needs approval from the state Senate. Becerra currently serves as the U.S. Representative for the 34th Congressional district in Los Angeles.

1 COMMENT

  1. It is a sad day when a person is nominated to the position of California’s Attorney General, and apparently is not that familiar with basic law. Maybe Becerra needs to go back to school and take qa class in law 101, or maybe he got his schooling at L.A. Southside. He definitely is not qualified for California, but is for Gov. Moonbeam. California will suffer. Don’t you just love California’s politicians.

Comments are closed.